Skip to main content

Heresies, Modern Thinking, and Evolutionism

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

People who want to slap leather with biblical Christianity may think they have some new concepts, but they are actually reworking old false teachings. This applies not only to those things that have been condemned as heresies, but the remarks of mockers and "skeptics" are often rehash hoary thinking from past centuries.


Socinianism, evolutionism, and other heresies affect the church
Fausto Sozzini (Faustus Socinus) was cracked
Derived from a public domain image at Wikimedia Commons
Before I go further, I must say that I'm doing something I've done before: taking material from smarter people and adding thoughts that pertain to my own areas of study. This article was heavily influenced by Phil Johnson's series on five major heresies (linked below). I hope you'll ride the trail with me and you'll see how some things come together.

There have been several times in Christian history when the faith appeared to be on its way to becoming hopelessly corrupted. God raised up faithful men to uphold the faith, sometimes appearing to be all alone in their efforts. I reckon that that they thought of Elijah in 1 Kings 19:14. 

As a side note, legend has it that the giver of gifts in secret, bishop Nikolaos of Myra (who later became associated with Santa Claus), didn't deck the halls at the Council of Nicea in 325. Instead, he decked the heretic Arius. Don't think Jude meant exactly that when he said to contend for the faith (Jude 1:3-4).

Emperor Constantine, who called for that Council, had a "Why can't we all just get along?" approach, and wasn't overmuch concerned with doctrinal accuracy. I commenced to pondering that evolutionism is rooted in bad thinking and paganism, but also invading the church. Indeed, theistic evolution is a form of the Pelagian Heresy. Also, evolutionism has elements of Gnosticism, which is esoteric knowledge imparted by the enlightened, and is found in New Age teachings.

The church fathers almost universally believed in recent creation through most of church history. Today, we have people who are compromising, adding deep time and evolution to the Bible, and accusing biblical creationists of being "divisive". Not hardly! They are the dividers.

Something that really takes the rag off the bush is a newer aberration called the Socinian Heresy. An owlhoot named Fausto Sozzini (in Latin, Faustus Socinus) was the driving force behind this one, drawing inspiration from his uncle, Lelio Sozzini. It is a collective, incorporating several other heresies and logical fallacies. Essentially, modern liberal theology is Socinianism. Postmodern and post-truth philosophies can have comfortable homesteads in Socinianism as well.

Socinianism essentially relies on two major points: rationalism and skepticism. Both of those philosophies are antithetical to biblical Christianity, as well as to science — and even rational thought itself. Rationalism is hardcore humanism, making human reason the arbiter of truth. Skepticism is a bit confusing for some people, because thinking people need healthy skepticism.


Unfortunately, many times folks who call themselves skeptics are not seeking convincing evidence. Rather, they are like those who practiced the ancient philosophy of skepticism, maintaining that absolute knowledge is impossible. (It's like some forms of agnosticism, "I don't know, and you don't either".) They have their minds made up, but are asking questions without being desirous of learning or answers. True Christianity is bad medicine to skeptics, postmoderns, and the like, because we affirm that there is ultimate truth, and it is found in Scripture. These "no truth" people are unthinking, and should realize that, according to their own philosophies, they are worthless people! That's a long ride on a bad trail away from the truth that each person has value in Jesus Christ.

Mr. Johnson quoted from John Calvin regarding Lalius Socinus, who kept badgering him with insincere questions that were intended to undermine the faith. Calvin wrote:
You need not expect me to reply to all the monstrous questions you propose to me. If you are gratified by floating around in such high-minded speculations, I pray you permit me, a humble disciple of Christ, to meditate on those things which tend to the edification of my faith. And hereafter, by my silence, I will indeed accomplish the thing I wish for: that you no longer annoy me in this way.
Biblical creationists have to deal with annoying people like this, and we get our share at The Question Evolution Project. We are trying to glorify God, presenting the truth of creation, and upholding the authority of Scripture. "Skeptics" come along with insincere questions for which they have already determined their answers, seeking to justify their rebellion against our Creator, and reveling when a Christian's time is wasted. Calling us cowards for refusing to waste our time on disingenuous, self-gratifying misotheists is preposterous. We've been expecting them (2 Peter 3:4-7). Most likely, other apologists would agree with me that we want to be about our business and have those tinhorns find other sources of gratification.

I regret reporting that there are some professing Christians who accept many heresies in one form or another, even renouncing logic and reason. Crackpot religious people like that (among others) are pleasing to angry atheists, who use the fallacy of hasty generalization to present those oddballs as representatives of all Christians (or even all "religious" people). No, we do appreciate logic, because it is a part of God's nature. Despite the claims of many atheopaths, faith and reason are at definitely not at odds with one another.

Elements of heresies can be found in churches, and in liberal theology. Bad philosophies and religious views, including pagan evolutionism, have crept into the church. We need to take a stand for the truth, even if we're unpopular and feel alone, like Elijah.

I'd like to strongly urge you to give a listen to the messages in Phil Johnson's series, "A Survey of Heresies".
It’s important for Christians to have a grasp of heresies that the church has battled over the centuries, because they often return with new clothing, and the unprepared Christian is likely to fall into these old pits. Phil does an excellent job of looking at some of the major heresies that are revisiting the church today: Socinianism, Arianism, Pelagianism, Gnosticism, and Judaizing. This is an excellent 6 part series that will shore up some weak points in the church today.
They are free to hear online or download the MP3s. USA and Canada, you can order the CD free of charge as well.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Andy Stanley, Frank Turek, and Bad Theology

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Andy Stanley has been disappointing some people, and causing quite a few to be alarmed by his opposition to the authority of Scripture. (Note: Do not be confused.  Charles  Stanley is his father, senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and heard on In Touch Ministries . I've found most of his teachings to be doctrinally sound, and he upholds the inerrancy and authority of the Bible.) Unfortunately, megachurch director Andy Stanley has been saying things that are destructive to the truth, including recommending the false teaching of theistic evolution. Gray wolf image credit: US National Park Service While shooting from the hip can be a good thing, someone claiming the title of pastor should reign himself in . Stanley was disrespectful of small churches, then apologized later . In another instance, " What  did he just say?", Stanley may have used a very bad word in a sermon. When the segment was legally posted on YouTube

Disappointment with Young Earth Creation

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen  First, a note for anyone who is curious. The usual format: introduction with some of my thoughts plus links for useful information, excerpts of featured articles, then links to keep reading. I put my name on it and call it an article when I have more to say. This one will be different. I will reference older articles, then add some thoughts that I hope will prove helpful. There is more following the excerpt and link. So, does anyone remember Ken Keathley? Medal image manufactured at Custom Medal Maker Several years ago, Ken Keathley renounced young earth creationism to accept an old earth view. Apparently, he was disappointed by people in the young earth community. No kidding? Taking Friendly Fire This is where I'm going to open up and get personal with both of my readers. Ken Keathley is not the only one who has been disappointed, and in addition, I've been deeply hurt by the young earth community. Things I have posted on social(ist) media have been &qu

Evaluating Truth Claims in Genesis

Some people try to dismiss Genesis as myth containing spiritual truth using elements from the pagan neighbors of the Hebrews. Others say it is misunderstood, as if the Creator of the universe was unable to communicate with us. With closer inspection, we see that Genesis is a historical narrative. Credit: RGBStock /  Billy Frank Alexander The idea that the early chapters of Genesis are mythological should not be accepted by professing Christians, as there are serious problems that result. (One of these is that Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others referred to these chapters as literal history, so by denying this, one is calling them liars!) Also, there are repercussions with the gospel message. Read some classical mythology, then come back to Genesis and see the difference. Myths are vague and have a different flow, but the Bible is precise. Indeed, even the sequence of creation days is specific — a day itself is defined. Interestingly, many translations have in Genesis 1:5 less accurate by us