Skip to main content

Cults Misusing Creation — A Warning for Discernment

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

When presenting the gospel, one thing that I emphasize the importance of biblical creation. Not for its own sake, but because of the importance of the authority of the Bible for the Christian. In my Weblogs and at The Question Evolution Project (as well as the Google Plus version), I post not only science supporting special creation and refuting evolution, but warnings about atheism's useful idiots who use atheistic interpretations of scientific evidence and elevate "science" into a magisterial position above Scripture. Theistic evolutionists and Old Earth Creationists (OECs) are compromisers who will call creationists "liars" and enemies of Christianity (it is interesting to be called a liar by a liar) — and still claim to believe the Bible.

Cults like Jehovah's Witnesses, atheists and other compromisers will use the creation-evolution issue to lure you into their schemes. We need to be discerning about what materials we read and what we use to prove our points.
Jehovah's Witnesses use creation and evolution to distort the truth
Atheists, OECs and theistic evolutionists are not the only dangers to a proper understanding of Scripture. Elsewhere, I wrote about how cults will use issues like the creation-evolution controversy to lure people into their deceptions. To add to that, Jehovah's Witnesses and others will say things that we can agree with ("Jesus is the only way to Heaven"), but they have different meanings for their words. I have three articles to recommend on this topic. First, "Creation and a Cult". Second, "How to Talk Creation with a Jehovah's Witness". Third, "A Cult on Facebook Claiming to be Creationist". For further information on cults, I refer you to CARM.

Giving you warnings and articles will only take you so far. Christians need to learn how to think. Not only critically (thinking with their minds instead of their emotions, examining the evidence, being aware of the logical fallacies used to manipulate people, and so on), but also to be knowledgeable about the Bible (2 Tim. 2.15, Acts 17.10-11, Col. 1.28). 

I do not want to cause confusion or contribute to someone going astray because I endorsed material from bad sources. If I was going to refute evolution just for its own sake, I would post material from cults (and Mohammedans, who consider themselves creationists).

I saw anti-evolution material posted on Facebook by creationists that was ultimately from the Christadelphian cult. When I pointed this out, the reply was that the source had not been checked — and they left it up anyway! The Intelligent Design people have done some excellent work refuting evolution, but their members come from diverse perspectives, so I seldom use them for reference. Some people seem to be so interested in "doing apologetics" that they not only ignore preparation, but they will use sources that deny the authority of Scripture and may even be denying who Jesus Christ really is.

What this comes down to is that we all need to be discerning. How do you know you can trust me? Really? Although I am responsible before almighty God to present the best material that I can, you do not know whether or not I take that responsibility seriously. Indeed, theological matters (not including side issues, we all have different views on those) should be checked with Scripture; believe the Bible, not what someone tells you. (For that matter, there have been articles from my favorite sources that I have been uncomfortable with, and have not passed along to my readers.) 

Edit: This paragraph needs to be inserted. I am not saying that every author needs to be vetted to make sure he or she lines up with your theology, but refuting evolution with anti-biblical and anti-creationist sources can be harmful. Citing, say, William Lane Craig (who disparages presuppositional apologetics and young earth creation) in an article about militant atheism can be helpful. Personally, I tend to use disclaimers at times. 

My advice is to be careful, be discerning, be skeptical (with a healthy skepticism), be thoughtful, be Scripturally minded, be prayerful. Am I asking too much? That depends on how much you value your spiritual life. These concepts transcend the creation-evolution issue. They apply to Christian living in general.

Popular posts from this blog

Andy Stanley, Frank Turek, and Bad Theology

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Andy Stanley has been disappointing some people, and causing quite a few to be alarmed by his opposition to the authority of Scripture. (Note: Do not be confused.  Charles  Stanley is his father, senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and heard on In Touch Ministries . I've found most of his teachings to be doctrinally sound, and he upholds the inerrancy and authority of the Bible.) Unfortunately, megachurch director Andy Stanley has been saying things that are destructive to the truth, including recommending the false teaching of theistic evolution. Gray wolf image credit: US National Park Service While shooting from the hip can be a good thing, someone claiming the title of pastor should reign himself in . Stanley was disrespectful of small churches, then apologized later . In another instance, " What  did he just say?", Stanley may have used a very bad word in a sermon. When the segment was legally posted on YouTube

Disappointment with Young Earth Creation

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen  First, a note for anyone who is curious. The usual format: introduction with some of my thoughts plus links for useful information, excerpts of featured articles, then links to keep reading. I put my name on it and call it an article when I have more to say. This one will be different. I will reference older articles, then add some thoughts that I hope will prove helpful. There is more following the excerpt and link. So, does anyone remember Ken Keathley? Medal image manufactured at Custom Medal Maker Several years ago, Ken Keathley renounced young earth creationism to accept an old earth view. Apparently, he was disappointed by people in the young earth community. No kidding? Taking Friendly Fire This is where I'm going to open up and get personal with both of my readers. Ken Keathley is not the only one who has been disappointed, and in addition, I've been deeply hurt by the young earth community. Things I have posted on social(ist) media have been &qu

Gopher Wood and Noah's Ark

Something that has puzzled readers of the sixth chapter of Genesis is the use of the term gopher wood. Footnotes often say that the "Hebrew term is uncertain", and Bible translations differ — "I know what that means, Cowboy Bob! Noah commanded his sons, "Shem, you gopher water, Ham can gopher more pitch, and Japheth can gopher wood". No. Anyway, Bible translations differ. Many use the term gopher wood, and using the translations in my copy of theWord Bible Software , Coverdale (1535,) Geneva (1587), and Tyndale (1526) translated it as pine. The NIV translates it as cypress and adds the "uncertain" reference. The KJV, NKJV, NASB, HCSB, ESV, WEB all render the term as gopher wood. Credit: Wikimedia Commons /  Cimerondagert  ( CC by-SA 4.0 ) An excellent possibility is that God was not specifying a particular tree that has disappeared since then, but that Noah was to use hardwood. Getting into the Hebrew language, we see the root word tha