Skip to main content

Fundamentalist and Literalist

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen 
Edited September 13, 2016

 "Be a clone and kiss conviction good night.
Cloneliness is next to Godliness. Right! . . .If you want to be one of his, gotta act like one of us!"
— Steve Taylor, from "I Want to be a Clone"

What is a Fundamentalist? If you ask around, you will probably receive several different kinds of answers. In the most basic sense, it is someone who believes in the fundamentals of the faith. In that way, most people who call themselves "Christian" are "Fundamentalists". One definition said, "Of or relating to or tending toward Fundamentalism". Thanks, that's very helpful, old son.

I like this one: "Christian fundamentalism refers to a set of religious beliefs within the Protestant community which emphasizes strict adherence to Christian beliefs, including a belief in the literal truth of the Bible." I agree with that definition for the most part.

As you probably know, "Fundamentalism" is another word with a great deal of connotations and emotional baggage, often used as a pejorative. People may think of the late (and often unfairly maligned) Jerry Falwell. Or that generic dour church where nobody seems happy. "Fundamentalist" implies ultra-strict, narrow minded views on Scripture. In the definition that I liked, it mentioned "the literal truth of the Bible". When someone asks if I take the Bible literally, I cringe. That is another loaded term, often a set-up for mockery. "Hey! This Fundie jerk takes the Bible literally. I bet you believe in all fairy stories, haw haw haw!" I don't cotton to owlhoots using labels to manipulate the emotions of others.

Someone said a useful phrase that I remembered for many years (unfortunately, I forgot who said it): I take the Bible seriously. People who want to mock us for believing the Bible use extremes and caricatures, and have a double standard for themselves (they will not complain about the use of the word "sunrise" for instance, because the sun does not actually "rise"). You see, in many ways, you can read the Bible as you would read a newspaper. When the text is using poetry, speaking authoritatively, describing real events, narrating history — read it accordingly.

Back to the Fundamentalist bit, now.
People use the word "Fundamentalist" a great deal. Unfortunately, they do not really understand its meaning, only their emotional reactions to it.
Image credit: morgueFile / ArielleJay
My father, a United Methodist Pastor, did not like Fundamentalists very much. One time, he referred to them as "fun-damn-mentalists" (I think this was because of their emphasis on the fires of Hell). I have found through experience and reading that Fundamentalists are very strict. Although well-intentioned, they are often legalistic, expecting adherence to extra-Biblical rules of conduct and so forth. From that springs judgmental attitudes towards other Christians:
  • He's not a true Christian, his hair is too long
  • They're not Christians, that music is rock and roll
  • She's obviously a false Christian, she's exposing too much skin
  • And she's wearing make up
  • No, brotherrrrrr, going to movies is a sin
  • A deck of cards has 52 soldiers in the Devil's army — but we can play the game of "Rook"
  • [Whatever] is not allowed here, it's worldly

If you've been reading this weblog, you know full well that I am downright enthusiastic about defending and presenting the faith. Man-made traditions, rules and regulations, I don't cotton to defending those. Do we judge people because they do not look or act in a way that we want them to look or act? Are we presuming to know the hearts of others (1 Sam. 16.7)? Do we use scriptural principles? Do we exercise righteous judgment (John 7.24, Matt. 7.20 NASB)? Are we walking in love (Eph. 5.2 ESV)?

I believe the fundamentals of the faith. And I take the Bible seriously — literally, when applicable (see this article on that subject). But I do not identify myself as a "Fundamentalist" because of confused definitions and connotations, savvy? I probably am a Fundamentalist according to some definitions.

You may want to see my follow-up article, "Christian Fundamentalism and Anti-Intellectualism".

ADDENDUM 4-23-2016: There is an outstanding lecture by Phil Johnson called "Dead Right — the Failure of Fundamentalism". Don't let the title throw you, he's not anti-fundamentalism per se, but there are problems with the Fundamentalist movement itself. He echoes some of the things I've said (interestingly, he came from a United Methodist background as well), but naturally goes much deeper. It's definitely worth your time. To download the MP3, go to this link and click on the tiny "Media Links: MP3" on the lower left. The PDF is available here.


Popular posts from this blog

Andy Stanley, Frank Turek, and Bad Theology

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Andy Stanley has been disappointing some people, and causing quite a few to be alarmed by his opposition to the authority of Scripture. (Note: Do not be confused.  Charles  Stanley is his father, senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and heard on In Touch Ministries . I've found most of his teachings to be doctrinally sound, and he upholds the inerrancy and authority of the Bible.) Unfortunately, megachurch director Andy Stanley has been saying things that are destructive to the truth, including recommending the false teaching of theistic evolution. Gray wolf image credit: US National Park Service While shooting from the hip can be a good thing, someone claiming the title of pastor should reign himself in . Stanley was disrespectful of small churches, then apologized later . In another instance, " What  did he just say?", Stanley may have used a very bad word in a sermon. When the segment was legally posted on YouTube

A Cowboy Bible?

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Before I get going on this, I'd better clarify something, even though many of my regular readers (and podcast interview listeners) know: my "cowboy" moniker is not earned. It's a nickname I picked up a few years ago, and it shows my cowboy attitude. I don't know nothin' 'bout no hayburners; tell me to saddle up a horse and ride, I'd probably get kicked, fall off, and land in poo. So, I need a guide. Yes, I lived in the West — the west side of Michigan. Anyway, being a cowboy at heart has helped me get things done. My father had a cowboy attitude as well, which is something I learned from testimonials at his funeral. Anyway, adding some Western-style lingo in posts and articles adds color and personality, I reckon, even though I usually have a conversational style for the most part. Assembled from components at Clker Clip Art A while back, I was looking for cowboy Bibles and came across the " Simplified Cowboy Versio

Poor Excuses for Rejecting Creation

So often with various kinds of conversion experiences where people get all worked up about something — then the excitement cools. Books are untouched on the shelves, no interest in lectures (videos or otherwise), but they have a smattering of knowledge. Image source before modification: Pixabay /  Spencer Wing This is especially sad when someone believes in Jesus Christ but then falls away (Matt. 13:18-23). In a similar way, someone can become excited about biblical creation science but get discouraged and distracted by philosophies, intimidated by militant atheists, harassed by college professors, teased by friends, and so on. There are some who claim to be "former creationists" that have saddled up to ride with the Old Earth brand (or even with professing atheists), but when they have discussions with knowledgeable creationists, it is discovered that they only had superficial knowledge of biblical creation science. Worse, their theology (which is intertwined with it) is als